<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>The Astrophysics Spectator</title>
		<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/</link>
		<description>Research, background, news, and commentary on Astronomy and Astrophysics.
			</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<copyright>© 2007 The Astrophysics Spectator</copyright>
		<managingEditor>editor@AstrophysicsSpectator.com</managingEditor>
		
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:15:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<item>
			<title>SN 1987A</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/topics/supernovae/CoreCollapse1987a.html</link>
			<category>Supernovae</category>
			<description>In February of 1987, astronomers saw the closest supernova of modern times; it
					was in the Large Magellanic Cloud, a neighboring dwarf galaxy.  This supernova,
					named SN 1987A, is incontrovertible proof that the collapse of the core of
					a massive star can produce a supernova.  Not only were neutrinos detected
					from this explosion, as one expects in the birth of a neutron star from the collapse
					of a stellar core, but also the star that exploded was observed many times before
					the supernova and found to be massive.  The surprise is that the star
					was a blue supergiant rather than the expected red supergiant.  Other striking features
					of this supernova are its unusual chemical composition, its high expansion velocity,
					its low luminosity, and the unusual shape of its nebula.  Some of these features are
					tied to the star being a blue supergiant, while others are clues to why the star was
					in a blue supergiant state when it exploded.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Neutrinos and SN 1987A</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/topics/supernovae/CoreCollapseNeutrinos1987a.html</link>
			<category>Supernovae</category>
			<description>A core-collapse supernova releases most of its energy as neutrinos.  This
				theoretical conclusion is confirmed by a single event, the supernova seen in
				the Large Magellanic Cloud in 1987.  Large neutrino detectors buried deep underground
				detect cosmic neutrinos by looking for neutrino collisions with electrons.  Three
				neutrino detectors saw a handful of these collisions by neutrinos traveling from
				the direction of the Large Magellanic Cloud just before a blue supergiant star
				in the nearby dwarf galaxy exploded.  The energy carried by these neutrinos
				is consistent with the energy generated in the core-collapse of a massive star.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Core-Collapse Supernovae</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/topics/supernovae/SupernovaeCoreCollapse.html</link>
			<category>Supernovae</category>
			<description>The most energetic supernovae are powered by gravitational potential energy.
				Once a massive star consumes all of its thermonuclear fuel, it is unable to support
				itself against its own gravity.  The core of such a star collapses to a neutron star.
				The birth of a neutron star is heralded by a burst of neutrinos that blows apart
				the remainder of the star.  We see this expanding debris as a supernova.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nuclear Reactions in Thermonuclear Supernovae</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/topics/supernovae/ThermonuclearBurning.html</link>
			<category>Supernovae</category>
			<description>Carbon and oxygen are converted into nickel
				in a white dwarf through a complex network of reactions.
				The incremental changes tend to follow the series of atomic
				nuclei that are multiples in composition of the helium
				nucleus.  For this reason, large amounts of neon-20,
				magnesium-24, silicon-28, and other elements with equal
				and even numbers of protons and neutrons are created.  But
				the reactions also tear down nuclei, creating many free
				protons, neutrons, and helium nuclei that combine with
				other atomic nuclei to produce elements and isotopes
				that do not have equal numbers of protons and neutrons
				or do not have an even number of protons or of
				neutrons.  Because thermonuclear fusion disrupts
				a white dwarf, the thermonuclear reactions in
				a white dwarf  contribute to the rich variety
				of chemical elements and isotopes we find throughout
				the universe.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Thermonuclear Supernovae</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/topics/supernovae/SupernovaeThermonuclear.html</link>
			<category>Supernovae</category>
			<description>Most type Ia supernovae are attributed to the
				thermonuclear explosion of white dwarfs.  A star becomes a
				white dwarf before it has completely consumed its thermonuclear
				fuel.  The amount of thermonuclear energy locked within a white
				dwarf is of order 0.1% of the white dwarf's rest mass energy.
				Theorists have three theories that explain what triggers the
				release of this energy, with each theory relying on the
				white dwarf being a member of a binary system.  The preferred
				theory is that the white dwarf grows in mass by pulling gas from
				its companion onto itself until it becomes gravitationally
				unstable; when the white dwarf collapses, its internal pressure
				and temperature rise until thermonuclear reactions cause it
				to explode.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Energetics of Thermonuclear Supernovae</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/topics/supernovae/ThermonuclearEnergetics.html</link>
			<category>Supernovae</category>
			<description>The thermonuclear energy locked inside a white dwarf
				is sufficient to blow the star apart.  In particular, white
				dwarfs composed of carbon and oxygen, which are more common and
				contain more thermonuclear energy than those composed of oxygen,
				neon, and magnesium, can release up to 0.1% of the star's rest
				mass energy as the carbon and oxygen are converted into
				an unstable isotope of nickel.  The energy released in the
				explosion goes into expanding the debris from the white dwarf
				to velocities approaching 10% of the speed of light.  The power
				we see radiated from a thermonuclear supernovae comes from the
				decay of radioactive nickel to iron.  The light we see from
				a thermonuclear supernovae is about 10% of the energy released
				in the explosion, or 0.01% of the white dwarf's rest mass energy.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 00:00:02 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Overview of Supernovae</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/topics/supernovae/</link>
			<category>Supernovae</category>
			<description>Theorists divide supernovae into two types:
				core-collapse supernovae and thermonuclear detonation
				supernovae.  The first type occurs when a massive star
				exhausts its thermonuclear fuel.  The second type occurs
				when a white dwarf experiences a thermonuclear runaway
				after becoming gravitationally unstable.  These rare but
				intense explosions can be seen across the universe.  They
				are responsible for all of the heavy elements in the universe,
				and are therefore necessary for human life.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Neutrino Cooling of Neutron Stars</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/topics/degeneracy/NeutronStarNeutrinoCooling.html</link>
			<category>Degenerate Objects</category>
			<description>Neutron stars are strong neutrinos emitters.  The
				power radiated by a neutron star as neutrinos far outstrips
				the power radiated as x-rays from the photosphere.  Three
				processes are responsible for generating the neutrinos: the
				direct Urca process, the modified Urca process, and the
				neutrino bremsstrahlung process.  The first process is rapid;
				it  operates at the cores of the most massive neutron
				stars.  The remaining-two processes, which operate throughout
				a neutrons star, cool the neutron star more slowly.  The
				neutrino emission cools a neutron star in only 100,000 years.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Neutrino Cooling of Degenerate Dwarfs</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/topics/degeneracy/DegenerateDwarfNeutrinoCooling.html</link>
			<category>Degenerate Objects</category>
			<description>The principal way that a degenerate dwarf cools
				is through the emission of neutrinos.  Unlike the
				main-sequence stars, which generate neutrinos as part
				of their thermonuclear generation of power, degenerate
				dwarfs generate neutrinos from photons.  This process
				allows degenerate stars to radiate away all of the energy
				in their cores, giving them an inverted temperature structure
				of a cold core surrounded by a hot outer layer.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Scientific Pig-Out</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/commentary/2009/Commentary20090130.html</link>
			<category>Commentary</category>
			<description>The American Physical Society is pleased with the bit
				of pork congress is giving the National Science Foundation
				and the National Aeronautic and Space Administration in the
				American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 that just passed
				the U.S. House of Representatives.  I explain why I believe
				their joy is misplaced, and why astronomy and astrophysics may
				see a long-term decline in funding because of increased
				government spending.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Inevitability of Black Holes</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/topics/degeneracy/BlackHoleInevitability.html</link>
			<category>Degenerate Objects</category>
			<description>Astrophysicists generally assume that the compact
				objects at the centers of galaxies are black holes.  Why
				couldn't these objects be massive neutron stars or some
				other type of degenerate body?  The reason is that under
				general relativity and our current understanding of particle
				physics, no stable degenerate object can exist with more than
				about 5 solar masses.  Gravity would need to deviate from
				general relativity for million-solar-mass degenerate objects
				to exist.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:02 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Radii of Degenerate Objects</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/topics/degeneracy/DegeneracyPressureRadius.html</link>
			<category>Degenerate Objects</category>
			<description>The radii of degenerate dwarfs and of neutron stars
				are fundamentally linked to the fundamental constants
				of physics.  The neutron star is about the size of
				a black hole of comparable mass.  The degenerate dwarf,
				on the other hand, has a radius that is of order 2,000 times
				larger.  This difference in radius is a direct consequence
				of the proton being more massive than the electron by this
				factor.  The mass of the proton sets the absolute scale
				for these objects.  The radius of the neutron star is of
				order 15 km, and the radius of the degenerate dwarf
				is comparable to Earth's.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Introduction to Degenerate Objects</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/topics/degeneracy/</link>
			<category>Degenerate Objects</category>
			<description>Degeneracy pressure—the pressure caused by the Pauli
				exclusion principle of quantum mechanics—is manifested by
				four types of astronomical object: the giant gaseous planet,
				the brown dwarf, the degenerate dwarf, and the neutron star.
				The first-three objects constitute the subclass of degenerate
				objects that are supported by electron degeneracy pressure.
				The neutron star is the subclass of degenerate objects supported
				by neutron and proton degeneracy pressure.  The degenerate
				dwarf and the neutron star are two of the three endpoints
				of stellar evolution (the third endpoint is the black hole).
				Binary star systems containing a degenerate object are the
				most brilliant systems in the Galaxy.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Degeneracy Pressure</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/topics/degeneracy/DegeneracyPressure.html</link>
			<category>Degenerate Objects</category>
			<description>Jupiter and Saturn have a fundamental link
			to the degenerate (white) dwarfs and neutron stars: all
			of these objects are supported against gravitational
			collapse by a pressure generated through the Pauli
			exclusion principle of quantum mechanics.  This pressure
			is called degeneracy pressure, and it acts through electrons
			in planets, brown dwarfs, and degenerate dwarfs, and through
			neutrons and protons in neutron stars.  It's existence is
			directly linked to existence of chemical elements with
			distinctive properties.  
				</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:00:02 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>the Masses of Degenerate Objects</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/topics/degeneracy/DegeneracyPressureMassLimits.html</link>
			<category>Degenerate Objects</category>
			<description>Objects supported by electron degeneracy pressure
				span a broad range of masses.  The low-mass end of this
				range, which is near the mass of Saturn, is set by the
				transition from pressure exerted by atoms to pressure
				exerted by degenerate electrons.  The high end of this range,
				which is 1.4 solar masses, is set by the gravitational
				instability that arises when the degenerate electrons have
				kinetic energies equal to the electron rest-mass energy.
				These limits are given by several fundamental constants
				of physics.  Despite the neutron stars being supported
				by neutron and proton degeneracy pressure rather than
				electron degeneracy pressure, they have an upper mass
				similar to that of the degenerate dwarf.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2008 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>An Implausible Light Thrust</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/commentary/2008/Commentary20081001.html</link>
			<category>Commentary</category>
			<description>The Chinese government is investing in
				a rocket engine called the Emdrive that generates thrust
				with microwaves.  There appears to be a slight problem,
				however, with this engine: it violates conservation of
				momentum.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:00:02 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Sizes of the Stars and the Planets</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/topics/overview/SizeStarsPlanets.html</link>
			<category>The Structure of the Universe</category>
			<description>The stars and planets have radii that are set by
				the balance of internal pressure against self-gravity.
				Because internal pressure has several sources, the stars
				and planets fall into several classes, each characterized
				by a specific source of pressure.  The consequence is that
				the objects of each class obey a unique relationship
				between radius and mass.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>No Bang from the Big Bang Machine</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/commentary/2008/Commentary20080917.html</link>
			<category>Commentary</category>
			<description>The Large Hadron Collider at CERN, a machine
				that accelerates protons to very high energies and then
				bangs them together, began operating on September 10, 2008.
				Some believe this machine threatens Earth. They need not
				worry, because the particle collisions created in this
				machine occur daily when cosmic rays strike Earth's
				atmosphere. Man can't yet rival nature's extremes.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:00:02 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Structure and Evolution of Brown Dwarfs</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/topics/degeneracy/BrownDwarfStructure.html</link>
			<category>Degenerate Objects</category>
			<description>The structure of a brown dwarf is set by
				degeneracy pressure.  Unlike a star, where the mass
				sets both the radius and the photospheric temperature,
				a brown dwarf has a radius and temperature that is nearly
				independent of its mass.  All brown dwarfs are about
				the same size as Jupiter.  The photospheric temperature
				of a brown dwarf is set by its age, although the lifetime
				of a brown dwarf is set by the mass.  Because the
				low-mass brown dwarfs cool much faster than the
				high-mass brown dwarfs, infrared surveys preferentially
				find the more-massive brown dwarfs.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Spotting the Minimum</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/commentary/2008/Commentary20080903.html</link>
			<category>Commentary</category>
			<description>Recently some people have claimed that the Sun
				is entering a new Maunder Minimum—a decades-long period
				of few sunspots—and that this will cause the Earth's
				atmosphere to cool.  The Sun is certainly quiet in 2008,
				but this is the normal quiet of a minimum in the 11 year
				sunspot cycle.  Clearly the tendency to interpret normal
				variations as fundamental changes is not confined to the
				global warming alarmists.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:00:02 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Brown Dwarfs</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/topics/degeneracy/BrownDwarf.html</link>
			<category>Degenerate Objects</category>
			<description>A class of object, long predicted by astrophysicists,
				sits in the mass range between the giant gaseous planets
				and the M dwarf stars.  These objects are called brown
				dwarfs.  They are massive enough to burn deuterium, but they
				are too light to burn hydrogen.  The first brown dwarf was
				observed orbiting an M dwarf star in 1988, and since that
				time, hundreds of additional brown dwarfs have been found.
				They are cool, so they are primarily emitters of infrared
				radiation.  In the early stages of their lives, they are
				powered by deuterium fusion and gravitational potential
				energy, but when they consume their deuterium, and when
				the electron degeneracy pressure stops their shrinkage,
				they grow cold and dark.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Stellar Types</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/topics/observation/StellarTypes.html</link>
			<category>Observational Astronomy</category>
			<description>In the nineteenth century, astronomers recognized
				that stars could be classified by their spectra into a handful
				of types.  Over time, this system was refined to characterize
				a star in terms of prototypical stars with similar spectra.
				This is the meaning of the jargon that the Sun is a G2 V
				star: the G2 refers to the pattern of lines in the Sun's
				spectrum, which is directly dependent on temperature, and
				the V refers to the widths of these lines, which are
				dependent on luminosity.  The advantage of this system
				is that astronomers can determine what stars are like the
				Sun in temperature and luminosity simply by looking at
				the patterns of lines in the stars' spectra.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Magnitude and Color in Astronomy</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/topics/observation/MagnitudesAndColors.html</link>
			<category>Observational Astronomy</category>
			<description>The magnitude system used by astronomers ranks
				stars by brightness, with the brightest stars having the
				lowest values of magnitude.  A star's magnitude is generally
				measured after the starlight has passed through a colored
				filter, which gives a measure of a star's color. Literally
				dozens of filter systems are used by astronomers.  The
				most common system for measuring color over the infrared,
				visible, and ultraviolet wavelengths is the Johnson-Cousins
				UBVRI system.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram of the Nearest Stars</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/topics/stars/HertzsprungRussellLocalStars.html</link>
			<category>Stars</category>
			<description>The HR diagram of the stars within 10 parsecs is
				presented on this page.  The diagram reveals that we are
				surrounded largely by two types of star: dark main-sequence
				stars and degenerate dwarfs.  Stars like the Sun are the
				exception rather than the rule, and the more luminous A stars
				and red giants are rather rare.  The brilliant and massive
				supergiant O and B stars, of which Rigel in the constellation
				Orion is an example, are completely absent from the local
				stellar neighborhood, despite their prominence in the night
				sky.  Most stars in the Galactic disk are much less luminous
				than the Sun, and most of the stellar mass of the Galactic
				disk is in these stars.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:02 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Table of the 10 Brightest stars within 10 Parsecs of the Sun</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/tables/ClosestBrightStars.html</link>
			<category>Stars</category>
			<description>Little more than 350 stars are known to be
				within 10 parsecs of the Sun.  Most of these are too dim
				to see with the unaided eye. Several, however, are among
				the brightest stars in the night sky.  The 10 brightest are
				listed in a table on this page, along with their distances,
				apparent visual magnitudes, absolute visual magnitudes,
				color indices, and stellar types.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram of Star Clusters</title>
			<link>http://www.AstrophysicsSpectator.com/topics/stars/HertzsprungRussellClusters.html</link>
			<category>Stars</category>
			<description>The nearby stars are of all ages, which gives them
				a broad variety of luminosities and colors.  To see stars of the
				same age, to see the effects of mass and composition alone on
				a star's color and luminosity, one must examine star clusters.
				All of the stars in a star cluster are born at about same time.
				The open clusters scattered in the Galactic disk provide us with
				collections of young stars.  The ancient globular clusters that
				swarm around the Galactic center provide us with collections of
				old stars.  By creating Herzsprung-Russell diagrams for both types
				of star cluster—plots of the colors and luminosities of
				stars—astrophysicists gain insight into how stars, especially
				stars more massive than the Sun, change over billions of years.
				</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
